A molecular machine can only use a few of these degrees of freedom because many of the atoms are required as structural components. In this context it is useful to extend the lock-and-key analogy of biological interactions [Rastetter, 1983,Gilbert & Greenberg, 1984]. A key opens a pin-tumbler lock by moving a set of two-part pins to positions which allow the two parts to separate when the key is turned [Roper, 1976,Macaulay, 1988]. The wrong key will leave one or more pins in a position that blocks the turning, and this will prevent the bolt from being released. Assumption 1 is that we only need to account for the motions of clusters of atoms--the molecular machine's ``pins''--in order to describe its operation. Likewise, it is not necessary to keep track of the individual atoms in a lock in order to understand how it works.
A second, closely related assumption
is that
the parts of a molecular machine move independently
(Assumption 2).
Likewise
the pins in a lock move independently.
Yet because of the design of a lock,
the bolt can only move if the pins are all aligned correctly
by the key.
Thus, although the individual pins are independent, they must
``cooperate'' for the lock to open.
If two pins were not independent, then it would be easier to pick the lock,
and it would not carry as much ``protective'' information because one pin could
be set and the position of the other would be determined.
For example, two pins fused together would act as one pin.
Thus, in this analogy, dspace refers to the number of ``pins''
used by the molecular machine, which is quite likely to be
much smaller than the degrees of freedom: